-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(material/datepicker): pass correct inject flags to injector #22665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We have a call to `Injector.get` in the date range input which is supposed to fall back to `null` if the value doesn't resolve, however we're missing the `Optional` flag. It works by accident at the moment, because the inject flags aren't actually being passed through by the framework. angular/angular#41592 is supposed to fix the framework issue, but their CI will break due to our usage. These changes fix our usage in order to unblock the framework PR.
mmalerba
approved these changes
May 11, 2021
andrewseguin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2021
We have a call to `Injector.get` in the date range input which is supposed to fall back to `null` if the value doesn't resolve, however we're missing the `Optional` flag. It works by accident at the moment, because the inject flags aren't actually being passed through by the framework. angular/angular#41592 is supposed to fix the framework issue, but their CI will break due to our usage. These changes fix our usage in order to unblock the framework PR. (cherry picked from commit 7367823)
14 tasks
crisbeto
added a commit
to crisbeto/material2
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2021
Fixes a few more cases like angular#22665 where we were injecting something optionally, but we weren't passing the optional injector flag.
wagnermaciel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2021
Fixes a few more cases like #22665 where we were injecting something optionally, but we weren't passing the optional injector flag.
wagnermaciel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2021
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
action: merge
The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker
cla: yes
PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
P3
An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent
target: patch
This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have a call to
Injector.get
in the date range input which is supposed to fall back tonull
if the value doesn't resolve, however we're missing theOptional
flag. It works by accident at the moment, because the inject flags aren't actually being passed through by the framework.angular/angular#41592 is supposed to fix the framework issue, but their CI will break due to our usage.
These changes fix our usage in order to unblock the framework PR.