api: improve split handling

[felixfontein]

SUMMARY

While reviewing #45 I noticed that there are two split() calls which need a split limit.

I rewrote the one handling WHERE to work better with #45 (namely first do the splitting, then search for the token WHERE in the splitted list to avoid finding a WHERE in a quoted string), and added a limit to the other.

ISSUE TYPE

• Bugfix Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

api

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #47 (c1b9aa2) into main (a88f4c8) will decrease coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #47      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.26%   80.13%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1221     1223       +2     
  Branches      162      161       -1     
==========================================
  Hits          980      980              
- Misses        183      184       +1     
- Partials       58       59       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
plugins/modules/api.py	70.74% <100.00%> (-0.77%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a88f4c8...c1b9aa2. Read the comment docs.

[NikolayDachev]

Will do a review this days sorry for delay

[NikolayDachev]

Testing look ok, lets pull this PR,
As main fix can be considered handling WHERE
list_to_dic() change is ok as well however we should fix it as general

[NikolayDachev]

@felixfontein If we don't have anything else here can I merge (or you can do that)?

[felixfontein]

@NikolayDachev feel free to press the button :) I can also press it, but I'm currently too busy with too many things... Merging this requires that #45 needs to be rebased, since there are conflicts. @akimrx it's probably easier if you squash your commits first, otherwise you have to resolve conflicts multiple times during rebasing.

[felixfontein]

@NikolayDachev thanks for reviewing and merging!