You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Antonio, I noticed that when I create a new patch with just one VCO going into your Phaser module everything is right but when I add a second one without any new virtual patch cable, controls of the second one affect the first one which is running. It sounds like both instances share the same set of internal parameters.
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yes, I think I have already managed to solve this, but maybe it's not in
the sources. I 'll double check
2017-10-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 sebastien-bouffier <[email protected]>:
Hi Antonio, I noticed that when I create a new patch with just one VCO
going into your Phaser module everything is right but when I add a second
one without any new virtual patch cable, controls of the second one affect
the first one which is running. It sounds like both instances share the
same set of internal parameters.
Best regards.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APURC_hGKjYxtlA9qnvCAZ6IQJ_Sw7X2ks5swz0RgaJpZM4QJ90L>
.
Hi Antonio, I noticed that when I create a new patch with just one VCO going into your Phaser module everything is right but when I add a second one without any new virtual patch cable, controls of the second one affect the first one which is running. It sounds like both instances share the same set of internal parameters.
Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: