Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding Maven group ID to clj-rethinkdb project #92

Closed
danielcompton opened this issue Sep 17, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Adding Maven group ID to clj-rethinkdb project #92

danielcompton opened this issue Sep 17, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@danielcompton
Copy link
Collaborator

With the imminent release of an official Java driver from RethinkDB it might be a good time to re-examine the group ID we're using (rethinkdb) as it may conflict with the official one or at least be confusing for people.

@apa512 do you have a preference for this? Something like com.apa512 could work, or any other domain you control.

On the other hand maybe this isn't a big deal and it's fine to stay as it is. Thoughts welcome.

rethinkdb/rethinkdb#3930

@apa512
Copy link
Owner

apa512 commented Sep 18, 2015

Sure, changing to com.apa512.rethinkdb seems like a good idea.

@danielcompton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@apa512 do you own apa512.com?

@apa512
Copy link
Owner

apa512 commented Sep 18, 2015

Yes.

@danielcompton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Cool. So the coordinates will change from [rethinkdb "0.11.0"] to [com.apa512/rethinkdb "0.11.0"]. Sound good?

@apa512
Copy link
Owner

apa512 commented Sep 18, 2015

I like it 👍

danielcompton added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2015
We don't want people to get confused between the official Java RethinkDB
driver and this driver.

Fixes #92
danielcompton added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2015
We don't want people to get confused between the official Java RethinkDB
driver and this driver.

Fixes #92
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants