feat: add scheme field test case

[batman-ezio]

Please answer these questions before submitting a pull request, or your PR will get closed.

Why submit this pull request?

• Bugfix
• New feature provided
• Improve performance
• Backport patches

What changes will this PR take into?

add an optional field scheme on the upstream form

Related issues

fix/resolve #1642

Checklist:

• Did you explain what problem does this PR solve? Or what new features have been added?
• Have you added corresponding test cases?
• Have you modified the corresponding document?
• Is this PR backward compatible? If it is not backward compatible, please discuss on the mailing list first

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1661 (26afa8d) into master (1fa467a) will increase coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 26afa8d differs from pull request most recent head ec569b1. Consider uploading reports for the commit ec569b1 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1661      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.35%   71.80%   +0.44%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        3128     3128              
==========================================
+ Hits         2232     2246      +14     
+ Misses        656      639      -17     
- Partials      240      243       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend-e2e-test	62.65% <ø> (+0.54%)	⬆️
backend-e2e-test-ginkgo	49.16% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️
backend-unit-test	52.29% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api/internal/utils/closer.go	33.33% <0.00%> (ø)
api/internal/core/store/store.go	87.95% <0.00%> (ø)
api/internal/core/store/storehub.go	74.76% <0.00%> (+3.73%)	⬆️
api/cmd/managerapi.go	59.45% <0.00%> (+5.40%)	⬆️
api/internal/core/storage/etcd.go	50.90% <0.00%> (+5.45%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fa467a...ec569b1. Read the comment docs.

[juzhiyuan]

cc @guoqqqi to take a look

[juzhiyuan]

also cc @guoqqqi to review.

[guoqqqi]

LGTM!

[membphis]

ci failed, please take a look: https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1661/checks?check_run_id=2301814384#step:10:798

[jbampton]

I have never done .tsx before. I have done one other .tsx review. So similar my view is that an array or list should be ordered somehow and mostly its done alphabetically. I always like rules, standards and style guides.

Suggested change

	{['http', 'https', 'grpc', 'grpcs'].map((item, index) => (
	{['grpc', 'grpcs', 'http', 'https'].map((item, index) => (

[netlify]

Deploy preview for apisix-dashboard ready!

Built with commit ec569b1

https://deploy-preview-1661--apisix-dashboard.netlify.app

[juzhiyuan]

I know what happened, one PR needs to be fixed.

[juzhiyuan]

just wait for fixing it 😂

[nic-chen]

@batman-ezio maybe you could sync code from master to try to fix FE CI

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 4 weeks if no further activity occurs. If you think that's incorrect or this pull request should instead be reviewed, please simply write any comment. Even if closed, you can still revive the PR at any time ordiscuss it on the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions]

This pull request/issue has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.