Add unit test to check FixedSizeBinaryArray input all none

[jackwener]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #1390.

Rationale for this change

I found that problem in #1390 is solved.

What changes are included in this PR?

Add a unit test to check the situation that input of FixedSizeBinaryArray all is none.

Are there any user-facing changes?

[jackwener]

@alamb PTAL

[alamb]

👍 thank you @jackwener !

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1405 (886184b) into master (ab41c25) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1405      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.10%   83.13%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         181      181              
  Lines       53244    53335      +91     
==========================================
+ Hits        44247    44338      +91     
  Misses       8997     8997              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
arrow/src/array/array_binary.rs	93.28% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
arrow/src/array/transform/mod.rs	86.31% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
parquet/src/encodings/encoding.rs	93.71% <0.00%> (+0.19%)	⬆️
parquet/src/file/serialized_reader.rs	95.65% <0.00%> (+1.04%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ab41c25...886184b. Read the comment docs.

[jackwener]

@alamb After thinking about it for a while, I think that although this ut does not solve the problem, it is also a supplement to the case, maybe we can still merge

[alamb]

I agree it seems reasonable to add a new unit test -- thank you @jackwener

[jamescorbett]

As Jack mentioned on the original issue this does not fix the problem.