Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deffered Object Store Config Parsing (#4191) #4192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2023

Conversation

tustvold
Copy link
Contributor

@tustvold tustvold commented May 10, 2023

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #4191

Rationale for this change

This closes #4191 whilst also making me happier that the current pattern is workable to support things like durations which need fallible parsing, etc...

What changes are included in this PR?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the object-store Object Store Interface label May 10, 2023
@tustvold tustvold force-pushed the deferred-object-store-config branch from db13f79 to a6b73b1 Compare May 10, 2023 11:17
@tustvold tustvold force-pushed the deferred-object-store-config branch from a6b73b1 to 26be298 Compare May 10, 2023 13:52
@tustvold tustvold marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2023 13:52
Copy link
Contributor

@roeap roeap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

really like this update!

Comment on lines +51 to +55
pub enum ClientConfigKey {
/// Allow non-TLS, i.e. non-HTTPS connections
AllowHttp,
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some users in delta-rs are asking to expose more client options on the python side, for this having some more keys defined might be helpful. Do you think this is something object_store wants to do in a follow-up?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think this is something object_store wants to do in a follow-up

Yes, 100%

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#4202 is the next step in exposing client options to the python side

@tustvold tustvold merged commit b314118 into apache:master May 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
object-store Object Store Interface
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Return Error on Invalid Config Value
2 participants