-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[C++] Compilation errors when re2::StringPiece is different from std::string_view #38282
Labels
Milestone
Comments
@raulcd issue for the problem you reported. I'm pushing a fix. |
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
…#38283) ### Rationale for this change The type signature of `ReplaceString` should be identical when arrow is compiled with or without `ARROW_WITH_RE2`. ### What changes are included in this PR? The right signature + delegating to the implementation that takes `re2::StringPiece`. The conversion should be a no-op when compiled and optimized. ### Are these changes tested? By existing tests and CI checks. * Closes: #38282 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
…#38283) ### Rationale for this change The type signature of `ReplaceString` should be identical when arrow is compiled with or without `ARROW_WITH_RE2`. ### What changes are included in this PR? The right signature + delegating to the implementation that takes `re2::StringPiece`. The conversion should be a no-op when compiled and optimized. ### Are these changes tested? By existing tests and CI checks. * Closes: #38282 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
JerAguilon
pushed a commit
to JerAguilon/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2023
…nature (apache#38283) ### Rationale for this change The type signature of `ReplaceString` should be identical when arrow is compiled with or without `ARROW_WITH_RE2`. ### What changes are included in this PR? The right signature + delegating to the implementation that takes `re2::StringPiece`. The conversion should be a no-op when compiled and optimized. ### Are these changes tested? By existing tests and CI checks. * Closes: apache#38282 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
loicalleyne
pushed a commit
to loicalleyne/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2023
…nature (apache#38283) ### Rationale for this change The type signature of `ReplaceString` should be identical when arrow is compiled with or without `ARROW_WITH_RE2`. ### What changes are included in this PR? The right signature + delegating to the implementation that takes `re2::StringPiece`. The conversion should be a no-op when compiled and optimized. ### Are these changes tested? By existing tests and CI checks. * Closes: apache#38282 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2024
…nature (apache#38283) ### Rationale for this change The type signature of `ReplaceString` should be identical when arrow is compiled with or without `ARROW_WITH_RE2`. ### What changes are included in this PR? The right signature + delegating to the implementation that takes `re2::StringPiece`. The conversion should be a no-op when compiled and optimized. ### Are these changes tested? By existing tests and CI checks. * Closes: apache#38282 Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.
Compilation errors when
re2::StringPiece
is different fromstd::string_view
.Component(s)
C++
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: