Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-44381: [Ruby][Release] Pin not only glib but also python on verification jobs #44382

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024

Conversation

raulcd
Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd commented Oct 11, 2024

Rationale for this change

Verification job is currently failing for Ruby.

What changes are included in this PR?

We can't use Python 3.13 and glib==2.80.5. So we use old Python as a workaround.

Are these changes tested?

Via archery

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@raulcd
Copy link
Member Author

raulcd commented Oct 11, 2024

@github-actions crossbow submit verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-conda-latest-amd64

Copy link

⚠️ GitHub issue #44381 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Oct 11, 2024
Copy link

Revision: 0df66ce

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-1eab905206

Task Status
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Oct 12, 2024

@github-actions crossbow submit verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-conda-latest-amd64

Copy link

Revision: f82c2ba

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-12cc3655fe

Task Status
verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-conda-latest-amd64 GitHub Actions

@kou kou changed the title GH-44381: [Ruby][Release] Revert pin for glib on verification jobs GH-44381: [Ruby][Release] Pin not only glib but also python on verification jobs Oct 12, 2024
@kou kou marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2024 09:08
Copy link
Member

@kou kou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Oct 12, 2024
Copy link
Member Author

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting merge Awaiting merge labels Oct 12, 2024
@raulcd raulcd merged commit 5638169 into apache:main Oct 12, 2024
10 checks passed
@raulcd raulcd removed the awaiting changes Awaiting changes label Oct 12, 2024
raulcd added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
…cation jobs (#44382)

### Rationale for this change

Verification job is currently failing for Ruby.

### What changes are included in this PR?

We can't use Python 3.13 and `glib==2.80.5`. So we use old Python as a workaround.

### Are these changes tested?

Via archery

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No
* GitHub Issue: #44381

Lead-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]>
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 5638169.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 10 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants