Add sqlReverseLookupThreshold for ReverseLookupRule. #15832
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If lots of keys map to the same value, reversing a LOOKUP call can slow things down unacceptably. To protect against this, this patch introduces a parameter sqlReverseLookupThreshold representing the maximum size of an IN filter that will be created as part of lookup reversal. If inSubQueryThreshold is set to a smaller value than sqlReverseLookupThreshold, then inSubQueryThreshold will be used instead. This allows users to use that single parameter to control IN sizes if they wish.
pranavbhole
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
abhishekagarwal87
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
| @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ public LookupExtractor build(Iterable<Pair<String, String>> keyValuePairs) | |||
| return new MapLookupExtractor(map, false); | |||
| } | |||
| }, | |||
| REVERSIBLE { | |||
| IMMUTABLE { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is it called immutable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's the immutable lookup map added in #15675
LakshSingla
pushed a commit
to LakshSingla/druid
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
If lots of keys map to the same value, reversing a LOOKUP call can slow things down unacceptably. To protect against this, this patch introduces a parameter sqlReverseLookupThreshold representing the maximum size of an IN filter that will be created as part of lookup reversal. If inSubQueryThreshold is set to a smaller value than sqlReverseLookupThreshold, then inSubQueryThreshold will be used instead. This allows users to use that single parameter to control IN sizes if they wish.
cryptoe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2024
If lots of keys map to the same value, reversing a LOOKUP call can slow things down unacceptably. To protect against this, this patch introduces a parameter sqlReverseLookupThreshold representing the maximum size of an IN filter that will be created as part of lookup reversal. If inSubQueryThreshold is set to a smaller value than sqlReverseLookupThreshold, then inSubQueryThreshold will be used instead. This allows users to use that single parameter to control IN sizes if they wish. Co-authored-by: Gian Merlino <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If lots of keys map to the same value, reversing a LOOKUP call can slow things down unacceptably. To protect against this, this patch introduces a parameter sqlReverseLookupThreshold representing the maximum size of an IN filter that will be created as part of lookup reversal.
If inSubQueryThreshold is set to a smaller value than sqlReverseLookupThreshold, then inSubQueryThreshold will be used instead. This allows users to use that single parameter to control IN sizes if they wish.
Benchmarks follow. I chose
10000as the default forsqlReverseLookupThresholdsince it keeps planning time under 1 second. Future work to speed up IN filters could allow us to raise the default threshold.