You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, RangerSecurableObject extends MetadataObject, but Ranger managers meta types different with Gravitino, for example, Ranger doesn't have METALAKE, ROLE, So we need to redefine RangerSecurableObject class.
How should we improve?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…ass (apache#5222)
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Add `RangerMetadataObject` class.
### Why are the changes needed?
Currently, RangerSecurableObject extends MetadataObject, but Ranger
managers meta types different with Gravitino, for example, Ranger
doesn't have `METALAKE`, `ROLE`, So we need to Refactor
RangerSecurableObject class.
Fix: apache#5196
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI Passed.
What would you like to be improved?
Currently, RangerSecurableObject extends MetadataObject, but Ranger managers meta types different with Gravitino, for example, Ranger doesn't have
METALAKE
,ROLE
, So we need to redefine RangerSecurableObject class.How should we improve?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: