-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[VL] Enable SPARK-10634 timestamp test case #5090
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -857,7 +857,6 @@ class VeloxTestSettings extends BackendTestSettings { | |
// decimal failed ut | ||
.exclude("SPARK-34212 Parquet should read decimals correctly") | ||
// Timestamp is read as INT96. | ||
.exclude("SPARK-10634 timestamp written and read as INT64 - truncation") | ||
.exclude("Migration from INT96 to TIMESTAMP_MICROS timestamp type") | ||
.exclude("SPARK-10365 timestamp written and read as INT64 - TIMESTAMP_MICROS") | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Have you tried above two unit tests, and are they related to the same issue? |
||
// Rewrite because the filter after datasource is not needed. | ||
|
@@ -869,7 +868,6 @@ class VeloxTestSettings extends BackendTestSettings { | |
// decimal failed ut | ||
.exclude("SPARK-34212 Parquet should read decimals correctly") | ||
// Timestamp is read as INT96. | ||
.exclude("SPARK-10634 timestamp written and read as INT64 - truncation") | ||
.exclude("Migration from INT96 to TIMESTAMP_MICROS timestamp type") | ||
.exclude("SPARK-10365 timestamp written and read as INT64 - TIMESTAMP_MICROS") | ||
// Rewrite because the filter after datasource is not needed. | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This message was added when int64 type was unsupported for timestamp reader. Could you update the message to illustrate why below tests are still disabled?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These two unit tests are still failing, but it's not the same issue. We can continue investigating to find the root cause.