This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
replace has_key by in
#8317
Merged
replace has_key by in
#8317
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Do you mind sync with master and trigger CI again? |
eric-haibin-lin
pushed a commit
to eric-haibin-lin/mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2017
rahul003
pushed a commit
to rahul003/mxnet
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This issue is the same as #2037, #2038, #2668, but there still exists codes using has_key() function which has been removed in Python3.x. Please have a check.
Checklist
Essentials
make lint)All passed!
Changes
has_keyfunction byinmethodComments