Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ORC-1076: Remove Travis PR Builder Link from README.md #991

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022
Merged

ORC-1076: Remove Travis PR Builder Link from README.md #991

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022

Conversation

dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to remove Travis PR Builder Link from README.md because it's misleading. Our main PR builder is GitHub Action which runs majority of tests. In addition, https://github.com/apache/orc/pulls is the correct link to show both PR builders' status.

Why are the changes needed?

To make README.md up-to-date.

How was this patch tested?

Since this is a doc change, manual review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the DOCS label Jan 5, 2022
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

cc @williamhyun , @guiyanakuang

@guiyanakuang
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @guiyanakuang !

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun merged commit 2c29393 into apache:main Jan 5, 2022
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the ORC-1076 branch January 5, 2022 23:43
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Jan 5, 2022
dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to remove `Travis PR Builder Link` from `README.md` because it's misleading. Our main PR builder is GitHub Action which runs majority of tests. In addition, https://github.com/apache/orc/pulls is the correct link to show both PR builders' status.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make `README.md` up-to-date.

### How was this patch tested?

Since this is a doc change, manual review.

(cherry picked from commit 2c29393)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun modified the milestones: 1.8.0, 1.7.3 Feb 2, 2022
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

This is backported to make it as a part of 1.7.3.

dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is an accumulated change to make the PR labeler up-to-date.
- Remove `.travis.yml` (#991)
- Add `dev` folder (#1136)
- Add `.clang-format` (#1308)

### Why are the changes needed?

To make the PR labeler up-to-date.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

Closes #1362 from dongjoon-hyun/ORC-1351.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
cxzl25 pushed a commit to cxzl25/orc that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to remove `Travis PR Builder Link` from `README.md` because it's misleading. Our main PR builder is GitHub Action which runs majority of tests. In addition, https://github.com/apache/orc/pulls is the correct link to show both PR builders' status.

### Why are the changes needed?

To make `README.md` up-to-date.

### How was this patch tested?

Since this is a doc change, manual review.
cxzl25 pushed a commit to cxzl25/orc that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is an accumulated change to make the PR labeler up-to-date.
- Remove `.travis.yml` (apache#991)
- Add `dev` folder (apache#1136)
- Add `.clang-format` (apache#1308)

### Why are the changes needed?

To make the PR labeler up-to-date.

### How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

Closes apache#1362 from dongjoon-hyun/ORC-1351.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants