Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#5695 Increasing test coverage pinot-common #12294

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

aditya0811
Copy link
Contributor

@aditya0811 aditya0811 commented Jan 21, 2024

5695

(*) Other labels to consider:

  • testing

@aditya0811 aditya0811 marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2024 14:44
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.78%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (c72e897).
Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #12294      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   61.78%   +0.03%     
  Complexity      207      207              
============================================
  Files          2436     2436              
  Lines        133233   133237       +4     
  Branches      20636    20639       +3     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    82319      +45     
+ Misses        44911    44859      -52     
- Partials       6048     6059      +11     
Flag Coverage Δ
custom-integration1 <0.01% <ø> (ø)
integration <0.01% <ø> (ø)
integration1 <0.01% <ø> (ø)
integration2 0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11 61.74% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
java-21 61.65% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false 61.76% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true 61.62% <ø> (+33.90%) ⬆️
temurin 61.78% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests 61.77% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
unittests1 46.93% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unittests2 27.72% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aditya0811 aditya0811 changed the title [DNM] Increasing test coverage pinot-common [Ready for review] Increasing test coverage pinot-common Jan 24, 2024
@aditya0811 aditya0811 changed the title [Ready for review] Increasing test coverage pinot-common Increasing test coverage pinot-common Jan 25, 2024
@gortiz gortiz added the testing label Feb 19, 2024
@Jackie-Jiang
Copy link
Contributor

Can you please take a look at the linter failure?
It would be very helpful if you can also include how many missing lines are covered within this new test

@gortiz
Copy link
Contributor

gortiz commented Feb 26, 2024

It seems there are some compilation issues. Can you fix them?

@aditya0811
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems there are some compilation issues. Can you fix them?

updated with latest code, constructor changed

@aditya0811
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you please take a look at the linter failure? It would be very helpful if you can also include how many missing lines are covered within this new test

Fixed. covers 79 missing lines, was not able to set up UT for L77.

@aditya0811 aditya0811 changed the title Increasing test coverage pinot-common #5695 Increasing test coverage pinot-common Feb 26, 2024
@gortiz gortiz merged commit 74989c0 into apache:master Feb 27, 2024
19 checks passed
@gortiz
Copy link
Contributor

gortiz commented Feb 27, 2024

Merged, thanks for this contribution and my personal apologies for taking so much time to merge it.

@aditya0811
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged, thanks for this contribution and my personal apologies for taking so much time to merge it.

no worries, happy to contribute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants