Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SPARK-9657][MLlib] Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength #7974

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[SPARK-9657][MLlib] Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength #7974

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

feynmanliang
Copy link
Contributor

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Aug 5, 2015

LGTM

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 5, 2015

Test build #39925 has finished for PR 7974 at commit 7ca533f.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • case class In(value: Expression, list: Seq[Expression]) extends Predicate
    • case class InSet(child: Expression, hset: Set[Any]) extends UnaryExpression with Predicate

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Aug 5, 2015

Merged into master and branch-1.5. Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in dac090d Aug 5, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2015
@mengxr
[SPARK-9657] Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength
30e9fcf 
mengxr

Author: Feynman Liang <[email protected]>

Closes #7974 from feynmanliang/SPARK-9657 and squashes the following commits:

7ca533f [Feynman Liang] Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength

(cherry picked from commit dac090d)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>
@feynmanliang feynmanliang changed the title [SPARK-9657]Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength [SPARK-9657][MLlib] Fix return type of getMaxPatternLength Aug 10, 2015
@feynmanliang feynmanliang deleted the SPARK-9657 branch August 17, 2015 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@feynmanliang @mengxr @SparkQA