Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI][Fix] Fixing lint #10445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2022
Merged

[CI][Fix] Fixing lint #10445

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2022

Conversation

lhutton1
Copy link
Contributor

@lhutton1 lhutton1 commented Mar 2, 2022

A linting issue was introduced in #10423, fixing this up.

Copy link
Contributor

@leandron leandron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for the fix @lhutton1

@leandron leandron mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2022
@lhutton1
Copy link
Contributor Author

lhutton1 commented Mar 2, 2022

Hit a flaky test mentioned in #10314, since this PR only fixes linting, I'll re-trigger with the "skip-ci" functionality.

@leandron
Copy link
Contributor

leandron commented Mar 2, 2022

Hit a flaky test mentioned in #10314, since this PR only fixes linting, I'll re-trigger with the "skip-ci" functionality.

I reviewed the changes (given the [skip ci] usage) LGTM.

A linting issue was introduced in apache#10423, fixing this up.

Change-Id: I06c518194e30dcaa755005f06b8b7280c237d386
@leandron
Copy link
Contributor

leandron commented Mar 2, 2022

This is now merged, thanks @lhutton1 !

@lhutton1 lhutton1 deleted the fix-lint branch March 2, 2022 17:40
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
A linting issue was introduced in apache#10423, fixing this up.

Change-Id: I06c518194e30dcaa755005f06b8b7280c237d386
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants