-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Relax][Bugfix] Apply FuseOps to nested DataflowBlock #17033
Merged
tqchen
merged 1 commit into
apache:main
from
Lunderberg:relax_bugfix_operator_fusion_inside_conditional
May 29, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tqchen Responding to the comment here, with conversation migrated to the new PR.
This change is intentional, and maintains the same behavior for constants as before. Prior to this change, the
else if
condition was entered for five of the six child classes ofrelax::LeafExprNode
, and theelse
branch with theLOG(FATAL)
was only entered for arelax::Var
.With this change, the behavior of all LeafExpr subclasses is the same: If encoutered without being previously assigned to a group, they are treated as a group of size one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This resolves an issue that results from the use of
PostOrderVisit
here, inVisitUnsupportedNode
. It looks like this function is intended to collect allVar
/Constant
nodes that are part of the RHS of a binding (e.g. extractingA
andB
fromC = R.add(A,B)
). However, it doesn't collect any bindings that may be part of a nested expression. As a result, variable bindings that are part of a conditional's body would erroneously trigger theLOG(FATAL)
inVisitLeaf
.