-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Relay] Add a unit test for structural equality #9745
Conversation
@comaniac might as well put this in. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for checking. Appreciate it.
I'll try to dive deep later by myself again to see how did that happen at my end.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for checking this!
fcfdfe6
to
91997c2
Compare
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test. (attempt 3)
91997c2
to
23faf7c
Compare
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test. (attempt 3)
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test. (attempt 3)
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test. (attempt 3)
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test. (attempt 3)
This is CORE-135 from the forums, which suggested structural equality
was deeply broken. But unable to repro. No harm including unit test.