chore: restore removed ts expect error comments

[ayushpahwa]

Description

I removed ts expect error comments while upgrading the jest lib. This was erroneous, the comments are still needed. No change in functionality, just to suppress ts errors.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

• Yes
• No

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced error handling and validation for Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) manipulations, improving stability during function calls.
  • Updated logic for translating UI elements based on AST conditions, including checks for ConditionalExpression and LogicalExpression nodes.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved robustness against malformed input by returning empty strings when AST generation fails.
  • Refined handling of missing root call expressions to maintain original code integrity.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the error handling and validation mechanisms in the index.ts file related to AST manipulations. Key updates include improved checks for specific AST node types, handling of malformed input, and modifications to several function signatures. These adjustments ensure that functions operate more reliably without causing unhandled exceptions due to invalid AST structures.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
app/client/packages/ast/src/actionCreator/index.ts	Enhanced error handling and validation in functions: canTranslateToUI, getFunctionArguments, setQueryParam, checkIfThenBlockExists, and checkIfCatchBlockExists. Updated function signatures for better clarity.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: restore removed ts expect error comments #37639: This PR directly modifies the same functions in app/client/packages/ast/src/actionCreator/index.ts as the main PR, enhancing error handling and validation checks for AST manipulations, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested labels

Tech Debt

Suggested reviewers

• sharat87
• ApekshaBhosale
• sagar-qa007

🌟 In the land of code where syntax flows,
Functions now dance with checks in their prose.
Errors once lurking, now kept at bay,
With validation in place, they won't lead astray.
So here's to the changes, both clever and bright,
Making our ASTs robust, a true coding delight! 🎉

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.