-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add upper pin to jsonschema #1487
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am normally against commenting things out instead of removing them.
In this case, I want it clearly documented why we have stopped the testing against jsonschema dev and why we have introduced an upper pin within the code itself. Otherwise, it becomes unclear when examining the code at first glance why these changes have been made and the intent for them to be temporary changes.
Should an issue with |
jsonschema 4.18 will introduce changes that are incompatible with asdf. More details can be found in: asdf-format#1485 this commit adds an upper pin to jsoncschema and removes it from the devdeps testing an issue was created to track removal of the pin: asdf-format#1486
970c1c0
to
bbded5d
Compare
I am suspicious that something is up with the reference resolution in meta schemas but so far I've been unable to come up with a non-asdf minimal case that fails. Given the extensive use of non-public portions of jsonschema within asdf it's possible the changes did not introduce any public backwards incompatibility and the issues we're encountering are our own fault. I'd rather wait to open an issue until we can determine that jsonschema is at fault. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hopefully these changes will be temporary
I vaguely remember a maxversion pin of jsonschema in the past, and eventually that gave astropy problems when something else required a new jsonschema that asdf cannot use. So hopefully this won't stay forever. 🤞 |
@meeseeksdev backport to 2.14.x |
Owee, I'm MrMeeseeks, Look at me. There seem to be a conflict, please backport manually. Here are approximate instructions:
And apply the correct labels and milestones. Congratulations — you did some good work! Hopefully your backport PR will be tested by the continuous integration and merged soon! Remember to remove the If these instructions are inaccurate, feel free to suggest an improvement. |
jsonschema 4.18 will introduce changes that are incompatible with asdf. More details can be found in:
#1485
this commit adds an upper pin to jsoncschema and removes it from the devdeps testing
As described in the issue, adding a warning filter was insufficient to allow the devdeps jobs to pass.
An issue was created to track removing the pin: #1486