This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2018. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Filter should call through to AuthorizationService #4385
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -26,6 +26,21 @@ public void InvalidUser() | |
Assert.True(authorizationContext.HttpContext.User.Identities.Any(i => i.IsAuthenticated)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Fact] | ||
public async Task AuthorizeFilterCanAuthorizeNonAuthenticatedUser() | ||
{ | ||
// Arrange | ||
var authorizeFilter = new AuthorizeFilter(new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder().RequireAssertion(_ => true).Build()); | ||
var authorizationContext = GetAuthorizationContext(services => services.AddAuthorization(), anonymous: true); | ||
authorizationContext.HttpContext.User = new ClaimsPrincipal(); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. add a variation for |
||
|
||
// Act | ||
await authorizeFilter.OnAuthorizationAsync(authorizationContext); | ||
|
||
// Assert | ||
Assert.Null(authorizationContext.Result); | ||
} | ||
|
||
[Fact] | ||
public async Task Invoke_ValidClaimShouldNotFail() | ||
{ | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not directly related to this PR, but I'm still not very comfortable with such code. It's a decision that should be made at the authorization service level, not in the authentication middleware 👎
@HaoK curious: do you remember the outcome of the alternate design I had suggested for
IAuthorizationService
? https://github.com/PinpointTownes/Security/commit/7ac1a2515015a98dc6f4919f28baa9db33beb50a#commitcomment-11507157Returning an
AuthorizationResult
class/struct/enum instead of a binary bool would allow much more flexibility IMHO, and would allow replacing the current crazy design, that consists in guessing whether anAuthenticationTicket
can be resolved by the authentication middleware to determine if a 401 or a 403 response should be returned 😄