0.3.0 release documentation #376
Conversation
|
|
||
| ## Release Date | ||
|
|
||
| Unreleased, scheduled for the week of 10/17/2016. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's use ISO8601 syntax throughout for clarity. 2016-10-17
| main: | ||
| parent: "release-notes" | ||
| identifier: 0.2.0 | ||
| weight: 80 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
probably don't need a weight here or in the other one. We're fine with sorting by reverse publish date.
| @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: "0.2.0" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like we need a "slug" field here too since it has a dot. slug: "0-2-0" will do the trick
| @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: "0.3.0" | |||
| menu: | ||
| main: | ||
| identifier: release-notes | ||
| weight: 20 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This probably should go below the module reference. What do you think?
|
|
||
| ### Module Improvements | ||
|
|
||
| RPM package install/uninstall support has been added via [\#373](https://github.com/asteris-llc/converge/pull/373). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what's the backslash here?
| wait queries, named locks, and the ability to use lists and maps in parameters. The internal API has | ||
| also been simplified to make it easier for programmers to create new modules. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Module Improvements |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"RPM Resource" would be a better subhead
|
|
||
| #### Node Metadata | ||
|
|
||
| Initial support for adding metadata to graph nodes was added via [\#369](https://github.com/asteris-llc/converge/pull/369). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is not a user facing change yet. It will be in the next release when we get better errors, names, etc out of it. But maybe it shouldn't be in the release notes?
|
|
||
| Initial support for adding metadata to graph nodes was added via [\#369](https://github.com/asteris-llc/converge/pull/369). | ||
|
|
||
| #### Conditional Waits |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
waits are not conditional, unless they're in a switch
|
|
||
| ## Examples | ||
| ## Examples/Documentation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
passive voice should be fixed in this section
...
I mean, paragraphs in this section should be in the active voice.
stevendborrelli
force-pushed
the
feature/0.3.0-release
branch
from
555ebcf to
4d57855
Compare
| #### Task Groups | ||
|
|
||
| Tasks can be assigned to a group to force multiple tasks to run | ||
| one at a time instead of in parallel. Locks are added as a node in the graph and released |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is slightly out of date with the latest implementation. locks are no longer nodes in the graph; instead we just ensure all nodes in the group are dependent on another node in the group.
Before 0.3.0 release tag:
cmd/version.go