Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds new sample pricing a portfolio of LIBOR swaptions with derivatives #126

Conversation

auto-differentiation-dev
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This adds a more elaborate example application which prices a portfolio of LIBOR Swaptions using a Monte-Carlo approach.
It calculates derivatives with adjoint mode using the path-wise approach,
i.e. it calculates them independently for each path and averages them in the end.

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Test Results

    29 files  ± 0      29 suites  ±0   12m 38s ⏱️ +38s
 1 313 tests + 1   1 313 ✅ + 1  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
38 039 runs  +29  38 039 ✅ +29  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ea01680. ± Comparison against base commit 906a9bc.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Oct 3, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11161513111

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 98.728%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11067988711: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 2406
Relevant Lines: 2437

💛 - Coveralls

@auto-differentiation-dev auto-differentiation-dev merged commit e9d8c8b into auto-differentiation:main Oct 3, 2024
57 checks passed
@auto-differentiation-dev auto-differentiation-dev deleted the feature/swaption-pricer-example branch October 3, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants