fix(config): add SourceAccount condition to Lambda permission #16617
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
According to [AWS Config best practices](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/config/latest/developerguide/evaluate-config_develop-rules_nodejs.html#restricted-lambda-policy), we should add a `SourceAccount` condition to the Lambda Permission we create in `CustomRule`. Note that we cannot add the `SourceArn` condition, because that would cause a cyclic dependency between the `LambdaPermission` resource, and the `Rule` resource (as the `Rule` can only be created _after_ the `LambdaPermission` has been created - this is validated by the AWS Config service).
|
|
skinny85
changed the title
RomainMuller
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
924c117 to
ebfd5f2
Compare
rix0rrr
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2021
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
xykkong
added a commit
to xykkong/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
* '15588' of https://github.com/xykkong/aws-cdk: (47 commits) chore: rollback `GenericSSMParameterImage` deprecation (backport aws#16798) (aws#16800) chore(deps): bump actions/setup-node from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 (aws#16778) Update CHANGELOG.md chore(release): 1.126.0 feat(assertions): matcher support for `templateMatches()` API (aws#16789) feat(stepfunctions-tasks): add step concurrency level to EmrCreateCluster (aws#15242) docs(s3): correct heading levels Object Ownership / Bucket deletion (aws#16790) chore(individual-pkg-gen): fix bug in setting alpha package visibility (aws#16787) fix(s3): setting `autoDeleteObjects` to `false` empties the bucket (aws#16756) fix(iam): `User.fromUserArn` does not work for ARNs that include a path (aws#16269) fix(cli): progress bar overshoots count by 1 for stack updates (aws#16168) fix(config): add SourceAccount condition to Lambda permission (aws#16617) docs(events): add a note about not using `EventPattern` with `CfnRule` (aws#16715) docs(core): fix reference to nonexistant enum value (aws#16716) chore(s3-deployments): update python version on BucketDeployment handler (aws#16771) chore: set response-requested length to 2 and closing-soon to 5 (aws#16763) fix(revert): "fix: CDK does not honor NO_PROXY settings (aws#16751)" (aws#16761) docs(GitHub issue templates): Upgrade to GitHub Issues v2 (aws#16592) chore: reset jsii-rosetta worker count to default (aws#16755) fix: CDK does not honor NO_PROXY settings (aws#16751) ...
njlynch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2021
According to [AWS Config best practices](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/config/latest/developerguide/evaluate-config_develop-rules_nodejs.html#restricted-lambda-policy), we should add a `SourceAccount` condition to the Lambda Permission we create in `CustomRule`. Note that we cannot add the `SourceArn` condition, because that would cause a cyclic dependency between the `LambdaPermission` resource, and the `Rule` resource (as the `Rule` can only be created _after_ the `LambdaPermission` has been created - this is validated by the AWS Config service - and so needs a `DependOn` for the Lambda Permission). ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
TikiTDO
pushed a commit
to TikiTDO/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2022
) According to [AWS Config best practices](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/config/latest/developerguide/evaluate-config_develop-rules_nodejs.html#restricted-lambda-policy), we should add a `SourceAccount` condition to the Lambda Permission we create in `CustomRule`. Note that we cannot add the `SourceArn` condition, because that would cause a cyclic dependency between the `LambdaPermission` resource, and the `Rule` resource (as the `Rule` can only be created _after_ the `LambdaPermission` has been created - this is validated by the AWS Config service - and so needs a `DependOn` for the Lambda Permission). ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to
AWS Config best practices,
we should add a
SourceAccountcondition to the Lambda Permission we create inCustomRule.Note that we cannot add the
SourceArncondition,because that would cause a cyclic dependency between the
LambdaPermissionresource,and the
Ruleresource(as the
Rulecan only be created after theLambdaPermissionhas been created -this is validated by the AWS Config service -
and so needs a
DependOnfor the Lambda Permission).By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license