-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(stepfunctions): adding custom state name prop #27306
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you try again with the title? Couple things:
- this is a feature, not a chore. if you feel like you need exemptions for integ tests, you can add the relevant labels yourself.
- standard is to not capitalize words
- since you are working in a particular module, the standard is to include the module name in the title (i.e.
feat(stepfunctions):
) - try to rework the title to be more descriptive and describe the feature that has been added. if you've followed the other steps we're now at "feat(stepfunctions): adding custom state name prop". I don't think people who read the title will immediately know where the custom state name prop can be added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
010de85
to
1163071
Compare
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
127fb18
to
b1b8491
Compare
b1b8491
to
ba8ef10
Compare
e7813c1
to
146819a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent!
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Closes #23532
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license