Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: being able to fetch block by height/hash #25

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

FilipHarald
Copy link
Contributor

frontend and backend

@FilipHarald FilipHarald requested a review from Mautjee September 16, 2024 16:40
@FilipHarald FilipHarald mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2024
7 tasks
@FilipHarald FilipHarald mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2024
1 task
Copy link
Contributor

@Mautjee Mautjee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@FilipHarald FilipHarald merged commit ebf1a1a into main Sep 17, 2024
@FilipHarald FilipHarald deleted the block_api_improvements branch September 18, 2024 11:29
Mautjee added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
* feat: local Aztec devnet & sandbox (#24)

* feat: being able to fetch block by height/hash (#25)

* feat: aztec sandbox reachable from outside minikube (#28)

* feat: storing l2 contract data (#17)

* devops: https implementation (#29)

* feat: initial ui block component (#35)

* feat: aztec-listener catch-up from genesis (#34)

* feat: add separate API-route for transactions #36  (#37)

* feat: adding transactions page and transaction details page (#42)

* feat: real data for block component (#41)

* hotfix: removed unused import for DB-controller

* bug: production frontend error fix (#43)

---------

Co-authored-by: Filip Harald <[email protected]>
@FilipHarald FilipHarald mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants