-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Path and PathFragment have been replaced with String-based implementations. They are pretty similar, but each method is dissimilar enough that I did not feel sharing code was appropriate. A summary of changes: PATH ==== * Subsumes LocalPath (deleted, its tests repurposed) * Use a simple string to back Path * Path instances are no longer interned; Reference equality will no longer work * Always normalized (same as before) * Some operations will now be slower, like instance compares (which were previously just a reference check) * Multiple identical paths will now consume more memory since they are not interned PATH FRAGMENT ============= * Use a simple string to back PathFragment * No more segment arrays with interned strings * Always normalized * Remove isNormalized * Replace some isNormalizied uses with containsUpLevelReferences() to check if path fragments try to escape their scope * To check if user input is normalized, supply static methods on PathFragment to validate the string before constructing a PathFragment * Because PathFragments are always normalized, we have to replace checks for literal "." from PathFragment#getPathString to PathFragment#getSafePathString. The latter returns "." for the empty string. * The previous implementation supported efficient segment semantics (segment count, iterating over segments). This is now expensive since we do longer have a segment array. ARTIFACT ======== * Remove Path instance. It is instead dynamically constructed on request. This is necessary to avoid this CL becoming a memory regression. RELNOTES: None PiperOrigin-RevId: 185062932
- Loading branch information
Showing
96 changed files
with
2,326 additions
and
4,698 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.