TechDebt: Add Support For Authorization By Survey ID

[NickPhura]

Links to Jira Tickets

n/a

Description of Changes

• Add support for authorization by for survey id.
• Update all paths under ../{surveyId} to use survey id based authorization.
• Updated a few GET endpoints to include collaborator/observer project permissions (was testing as a collaborator and was getting endpoint failures when trying to load a survey page).

Testing Notes

• The only 'real' changes/enhancements are in the service/repo files.
• All of the ../paths/.. changes are just to update to auth check to use survey id instead of project id.

Everything should work as before.

[github-actions]

Openshift URLs for the PR Deployment:

• App Route: https://biohubbc-app-1186-af2668-dev.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/
• Api Route: https://biohubbc-api-1186-af2668-dev.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/
• Pods: https://console.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/k8s/ns/af2668-dev/pods?name=1186

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (e8fd46a) 58.16% compared to head (fb23bfd) 58.19%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
api/src/services/project-participation-service.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...c/repositories/project-participation-repository.ts	83.33%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
api/src/services/authorization-service.ts	95.23%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1186      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.16%   58.19%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         590      590              
  Lines       17964    17985      +21     
  Branches     2767     2773       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        10448    10466      +18     
- Misses       6831     6833       +2     
- Partials      685      686       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[KjartanE]

🐈 Ran locally, functioned properly

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

8.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[curtisupshall]

Looks good to me 🛺