SIMSBIOHUB-530: Unique Key Constraint on Survey Funding Source

[KjartanE]

Links to Jira Tickets

• https://apps.nrs.gov.bc.ca/int/jira/browse/SIMSBIOHUB-530?

Description of Changes

• added Unique Key Constraint on Survey Funding Source table
• create yup schema validation for no duplicate funding source

Testing Notes

• {List any relevant testing considerations, necessary pre-reqs, and areas of the app to focus on. Specifically, include anything that will help the reviewers of this PR verify the code is functioning as expected.}

[github-actions]

Openshift URLs for the PR Deployment:

• App Route: https://biohubbc-app-1244-af2668-dev.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/
• Api Route: https://biohubbc-api-1244-af2668-dev.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/
• Pods: https://console.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/k8s/ns/af2668-dev/pods?name=1244

[al-rosenthal]

ran this locally and it works. It would be great if the funding sources were also highlighted in red, the error text is easy to miss if you have to scroll through the form to find the issue

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 20.00000% with 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.54%. Comparing base (0daa88d) to head (0932839).

Files	Patch %	Lines
app/src/utils/YupSchema.ts	25.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...res/surveys/components/SurveyFundingSourceForm.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1244      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.56%   54.54%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         599      599              
  Lines       18392    18401       +9     
  Branches     2837     2839       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        10035    10037       +2     
- Misses       7703     7710       +7     
  Partials      654      654              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[NickPhura]

ran this locally and it works. It would be great if the funding sources were also highlighted in red, the error text is easy to miss if you have to scroll through the form to find the issue

Agreed. Though it looks like this matches the current behaviour of permits (which has the same unique constraint), so maybe something we can leave for a future ticket

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud