Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it not be more robust to align the first member with
#[cfg_attr(feature = "webgl", align(16))]
in the Rust and@align(16)
in the WGSL, rather than have to maintain the size of the padding member?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, adding alignment attributes to the first or last (or middle!) members works.
Interestingly, as far as I can tell, this doesn't actually result in any additional padding in the generated glsl. So this seems to be more about appeasing wgpu rather than an actual webgl2 limitation?
I had previously attempted various alignment and padding attributes without luck (likely user error), but was lead to believe by gfx-rs/wgpu#2832 (comment) that manual padding was the way to go.
I'm in favor of this quick fix that is consistent with what we already have on the 3d side, but perhaps we should open an issue to track/investigate the issue further? It seems like pure coincidence that this is the only place where the issue shows up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that this is worth investigating. Opened an issue here: #6685