For December 2017

[mrosseel]

Basic information

Specify the amount of BSQ you are requesting, and the BSQ address that amount should be paid to:

• BSQ amount requested: 6250
• BSQ address: B1CZf25cS7KrGJnT8Z5uq8DbUApZLydCkj

Details

Provide links to the work you are requesting compensation for, along with any comments or explanations that will help stakeholders understand its value.

API

regtest fix:
https://github.com/mrosseel/bisq-api/issues/2
bisq-network/bisq#1103

added dockerfile on request:
https://github.com/mrosseel/bisq-api/commit/5fe51e3a57f65e28c3cefbeb013f01f4745dfe0b

Monitoring

Monitoring fixes:
https://github.com/mrosseel/bisq-monitoring/commits/master

Various

Pricenode data feed troubleshooting:
bisq-network/bisq#1088
bisq-network/bisq#1089

Hosting

Monthly costs nodes: 50 / node * 5: 250 BQS

Running:
1 Price node + bitcoinaverage subscription
1 Seed node
2 Bitcoin full nodes
1 Monitoring node + 1 messaging sync node (on one server)

Roles

bisq-network/roles#22 (comment)

[cbeams]

Hi @mrosseel, I just noticed this is still in draft mode and that there's no BSQ amount / address yet. I'll be filling out the voting spreadsheet between now and EOD. Could you get those values in there by then?

[mrosseel]

hey @cbeams yes should be complete now

[cbeams]

Thanks. This request has been entered into the 2017.12 tab of the BSQ stake and voting spreadsheet and is ready to be voted on.

[csacher]

@mrosseel the role spec is missing at: https://github.com/bisq-network/roles
Please follow "How to Create a New Role" (point 1 and 2 are already settled, follow 3,4,5).
Thanks.

[cbeams]

bisq-network/bisq#1103 and bisq-network/bisq#1088 have not been merged. This seems to violate the principle of requesting compensation for completed work only. Perhaps I'm missing something, so I've voted 0 for this request in the meantime. Happy to change my vote to 1 tomorrow morning if there is further feedback.

[mrosseel]

Agreed for #1103 (I did a workaround to help out the api user since this route would take too long).
For #1088 it seems this is merged in PR #1089

[cbeams]

Closing as complete. See bisq-network/dao#26.