Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove dead store in ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax #765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2020

Conversation

fanquake
Copy link
Member

This change was made in bitcoin/bitcoin without upstreaming. So this is
a followup to the comment here: bitcoin/bitcoin#19228 (comment).

See also: bitcoin/bitcoin#11073.

This change was made in bitcoin/bitcoin without upstreaming. So this is
a followup to the comment here:
bitcoin/bitcoin#19228 (comment).

See also: bitcoin/bitcoin#11073.
@elichai
Copy link
Contributor

elichai commented Jun 29, 2020

utACK f00d657, it does look like we don't use that assignment

Copy link
Contributor

@jonasnick jonasnick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK f00d657

@jonasnick jonasnick merged commit 3f4a5a1 into bitcoin-core:master Jun 29, 2020
@fanquake fanquake deleted the upstream_11073_post_19228 branch June 29, 2020 08:43
@real-or-random
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #758 but #758 needs more work.

jasonbcox pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2020
Summary:
This change was made in bitcoin/bitcoin without upstreaming. So this is
a followup to the comment here:
bitcoin/bitcoin#19228 (comment).

See also: bitcoin/bitcoin#11073.

This is a backport of libsecp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#765 | PR765]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7592
deadalnix pushed a commit to Bitcoin-ABC/secp256k1 that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
Summary:
This change was made in bitcoin/bitcoin without upstreaming. So this is
a followup to the comment here:
bitcoin/bitcoin#19228 (comment).

See also: bitcoin/bitcoin#11073.

This is a backport of libsecp256k1 [[bitcoin-core/secp256k1#765 | PR765]]

Test Plan:
  ninja check-secp256k1

Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, majcosta

Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D7592
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants