This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 13, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
add ability to run deploy on static client #30
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f415854
add 'logSkyuxVersion' property
Blackbaud-TimPepper 05596ca
Merge branch 'master' into add-logSkyuxVersion-prop
Blackbaud-TimPepper c6b5e40
add ability to run deploy on static client
Blackbaud-TimPepper e4b17e0
allow multiple bundle files
Blackbaud-TimPepper 7c2630a
remove debugging code and add function docs
Blackbaud-TimPepper 43f55d1
clean up logic
Blackbaud-TimPepper 50bc964
update url name convention
Blackbaud-TimPepper 6ff0651
fix extension issue
Blackbaud-TimPepper 23351cd
Merge branch 'master' into add-static-client-flag
Blackbaud-TimPepper de87543
Saving bundles path.
4927226
Merge pull request #34 from blackbaud/add-static-client-flag-bundles
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some of our bundles definitely have multiple files (regular vs minified). I would adjust this to publish anything
*.*
inside thebundles
folder.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would we want all the files? Currently the following logic receives a single path. What would be the best path forward for handling multiple files?