Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent naming of low-level function #532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2023

Conversation

albcab
Copy link
Member

@albcab albcab commented May 8, 2023

Closes #280

Copy link
Member

@junpenglao junpenglao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #532 (7966f81) into main (6fb0198) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #532   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.28%   99.28%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        1948     1948           
=======================================
  Hits         1934     1934           
  Misses         14       14           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
blackjax/kernels.py 99.21% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/elliptical_slice.py 95.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/ghmc.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/hmc.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/mala.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/nuts.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/mcmc/periodic_orbital.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/sgmcmc/csgld.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/sgmcmc/sghmc.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
blackjax/sgmcmc/sgld.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

@albcab albcab merged commit e9b544c into blackjax-devs:main May 8, 2023
@albcab albcab deleted the consistent-naming branch May 8, 2023 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Names of lower-level implementations are inconsistent
2 participants