-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make mEstimator variable names consistent with math #188
Merged
dellaert
merged 4 commits into
borglab:develop
from
michaelbosse:fix_bug_robust_residuals
Nov 30, 2021
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23f5c8c
Make variable names consistent with math
michaelbosse 102123c
Merge branch 'develop' into fix_bug_robust_residuals
varunagrawal a5ff750
update completed TODOs
varunagrawal 6e46b72
add unit test for NonlinearFactor weight with different noise models
varunagrawal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might cause regressions. 🙁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, this is very significant, and seems fishy. Too bad this stuff did not get resolved when it was fresh in our minds, but now we have to re-argue this, and why it was not in @yetongumich PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. I believe the
0.5
should NOT be present, since if thenoiseModel_
is not robust, the weight function should simply be 1 (which in NoiseModel.h it is). If the noise model is robust, then it should just return the weight value for that particular M-estimator given the residuals.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interestingly, there isn't any test for this 😢
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interestingly, there isn't any reasonable usages for this function either...
Also, I think the 0.5 factor should not be there. @dellaert
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only usage of this function is in
gtsam_unstable/partition
, so I suggest this function to be moved to unstable as a standalone function there.Plus, this change is correct.