Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix edge cases associated with nested/recursive PEP 695 aliases #181

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

brentyi
Copy link
Owner

@brentyi brentyi commented Oct 22, 2024

cc #177

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.71%. Comparing base (1f76596) to head (5ed1b0d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #181   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.71%   99.71%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        2117     2123    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2111     2117    +6     
  Misses          6        6           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.71% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@brentyi brentyi changed the title Fix edge cases associated with nested/recursive PEP695 aliases Fix edge cases associated with nested/recursive PEP 695 aliases Oct 22, 2024
@brentyi brentyi merged commit 9ec8ecf into main Oct 22, 2024
13 checks passed
@brentyi brentyi deleted the brent/more_typealias_fixes branch October 22, 2024 09:35
brentyi added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
* Fix edge cases with recursive type aliases

* Generated tests

* Add RecursionError check for recursive types

* NewType / alias cleanup

* Docs

* Nits, more tests

* Bump version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant