Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FilterMutectCalls difference between 4.0.2.1 and 4.0.3.0 #4625

Closed
igordot opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

FilterMutectCalls difference between 4.0.2.1 and 4.0.3.0 #4625

igordot opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@igordot
Copy link

igordot commented Apr 3, 2018

I tried running FilterMutectCalls on a VCF generated with Mutect2 for matched tumor-normal samples. With 4.0.2.1, I get some variants that are labeled PASS as would be expected, but with 4.0.3.0, I get 0. That does not seem right.

@davidbenjamin davidbenjamin self-assigned this Apr 9, 2018
@davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

@igordot When you get no PASS variants are you filtering Mutect2 calls from 4.0.3.0? What is your command line? Could you paste a few vcf lines of variants that were PASS in 4.0.2.1 but filtered in 4.0.3.0? Which filter(s) tends to be most responsible for PASSes getting filtered?

@igordot
Copy link
Author

igordot commented Apr 9, 2018

I actually cross-posted this issue on GATK forums (the actual commands and variants are there also): https://gatkforums.broadinstitute.org/gatk/discussion/11752/filtermutectcalls-change-between-4-0-2-1-and-4-0-3-0

In the meantime, I noticed something else. The variants that were PASS with 4.0.2.1 are not labeled as PASS with 4.0.3.0, but also not tagged with any failed filters. If I filter for "." in the FILTER field (column 7), I only get those variants that were PASS with 4.0.2.1. It seems like they should have been labeled PASS, but were not for some reason.

@chandrans
Copy link
Contributor

@igordot Alright, it seems this is a case of PASS turning into . in 4.0.3.0. David @davidbenjamin if you could confirm, that would be great. Also, it would be nice to get PASS back into the FILTER column instead of .

@davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

@igordot @chandrans The fix is almost in.

@chandrans
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks David. I think we can close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants