Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

restored explicit PASS (as opposed to empty) filter in Mutect2 #4644

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2018

Conversation

davidbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #4625.

@takutosato Could you review this? It's a one-liner.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4644 into master will increase coverage by 0.007%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##              master     #4644       +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage     79.807%   79.814%   +0.007%     
- Complexity     17163     17165        +2     
===============================================
  Files           1067      1067               
  Lines          62439     62440        +1     
  Branches       10138     10138               
===============================================
+ Hits           49831     49836        +5     
+ Misses          8661      8657        -4     
  Partials        3947      3947
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...r/tools/walkers/mutect/Mutect2FilteringEngine.java 82.877% <100%> (+0.118%) 40 <1> (ø) ⬇️
...utils/smithwaterman/SmithWatermanIntelAligner.java 90% <0%> (+40%) 3% <0%> (+2%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@takutosato takutosato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Look good!

@davidbenjamin davidbenjamin merged commit f755156 into master Apr 10, 2018
@davidbenjamin davidbenjamin deleted the db_issue_4625 branch April 10, 2018 18:02
cwhelan pushed a commit to cwhelan/gatk-linked-reads that referenced this pull request May 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants