Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing MarkDuplicatesGATK #5166

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2018
Merged

Removing MarkDuplicatesGATK #5166

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2018

Conversation

jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator

In light of the newly updated MarkDuplicatesSpark which is finally reaching the point where we trust it, we have evaluated that the work of maintaining both this tool and MarkDuplicatesSpark was too great considering how little code they could directly reuse relative to eachother.

Resolves #4896 #3705

… Picard implemenation and MarkDuplicatesGATK
@jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I did not remove EstimateLibraryComplexityGATK, It would be easy to do as part of this pr and would mean most of the markDuplicatesPackage can be removed entirely.

@lbergelson
Copy link
Member

I'd kill EstimateLibraryComplexity while you're at it.

Copy link
Member

@lbergelson lbergelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jamesemery One comment about moving tests, I'm not sure they all should move up since ostensibly those top level tests should be general to all markduplicates ( and we would like to eventually merge with the picard tests directly...)

I would delete EstimateLibraryComplexityGATK as well while we're here...

}

@Test(dataProvider = "readNameData")
public void testOpticalDuplicateClusterSamePositionNoOpticalDuplicates(final String readName1, final String readName2) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why move all these tests up to AbstractMarkDuplicatesCommandLineTest? It doesn't seem like things like testHashCollisionHandling and testMarkDuplicatesSparkIntegrationTestLocal` belong there.

@jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lbergelson I agree with you about moving tests up, though I would make the point that there were many tests that got pushed down in the first place because they would involve fixing bugs in MarkDuplicatesGATK that were already fixed in MarkDuplicatesSpark, I will audit the ones I did and didn't push up so i'm more confident there is a reason to have tests pushed down or not.

@jamesemery
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lbergelson back to you

@jamesemery jamesemery assigned lbergelson and unassigned jamesemery Sep 7, 2018
Copy link
Member

@lbergelson lbergelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@jamesemery jamesemery merged commit 2386612 into master Sep 10, 2018
@jamesemery jamesemery deleted the je_removeMarkDuplicatesGATK branch September 10, 2018 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants