-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing MarkDuplicatesGATK #5166
Conversation
… Picard implemenation and MarkDuplicatesGATK
I did not remove EstimateLibraryComplexityGATK, It would be easy to do as part of this pr and would mean most of the markDuplicatesPackage can be removed entirely. |
I'd kill EstimateLibraryComplexity while you're at it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jamesemery One comment about moving tests, I'm not sure they all should move up since ostensibly those top level tests should be general to all markduplicates ( and we would like to eventually merge with the picard tests directly...)
I would delete EstimateLibraryComplexityGATK as well while we're here...
} | ||
|
||
@Test(dataProvider = "readNameData") | ||
public void testOpticalDuplicateClusterSamePositionNoOpticalDuplicates(final String readName1, final String readName2) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why move all these tests up to AbstractMarkDuplicatesCommandLineTest? It doesn't seem like things like testHashCollisionHandling and
testMarkDuplicatesSparkIntegrationTestLocal` belong there.
@lbergelson I agree with you about moving tests up, though I would make the point that there were many tests that got pushed down in the first place because they would involve fixing bugs in MarkDuplicatesGATK that were already fixed in MarkDuplicatesSpark, I will audit the ones I did and didn't push up so i'm more confident there is a reason to have tests pushed down or not. |
@lbergelson back to you |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
In light of the newly updated MarkDuplicatesSpark which is finally reaching the point where we trust it, we have evaluated that the work of maintaining both this tool and MarkDuplicatesSpark was too great considering how little code they could directly reuse relative to eachother.
Resolves #4896 #3705