Update google-cloud-nio to support underscores in bucket names #1903
Conversation
kshakir
force-pushed
the
ks_bump_gcs_nio
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c4f937c to
939f41b
Compare
|
The current 939f41b is proof of at least one exit from Dependency Hell 🔥 There are probably other alternatives to fixing the chain of issues in the description. Let me know what you think, as either way we can use something similar over in broadinstitute/gatk#8439 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kshakir 1 typo and 1 question. Good to merge after the the typo is fixed.
| import java.nio.file.Path; | ||
| import java.nio.file.Paths; | ||
|
|
||
| public class GATKBucketUtilsTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copied this here because I didn't see another test to catch if support for underscores in bucket names regressed.
I added the test after seeing "Added or modified tests to cover changes and any new functionality" in the checklist in the issues template.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heh, right, that makes sense. I forgot why we were doing this in the first place...
build.gradle
Outdated
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| wrapper { | ||
| gradleVersion = '7.5.1' | ||
| gradleVersion = '8.1.1' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seems to be a mismatch here, this says 8.1.1 but the wrapper properties says 8.2.1. I think this should be 8.2.1.
|
@kshakir Thanks for the clear explanation and the improvements to the gradle build. This sounds like one of those painful to track down explanations. I suspect if necessary we could avoid the need to upgrade by stripping the java 19 class files from the shadow jar instead of processing them. I think upgrading gradle/shadow is better though, and since you've just done it I don't see any reason to do it differently here... I'm hoping it's not too much harder to update the gatk gradle build to 8 as well? This puts us in an easier thank position to update to java 21 in September too. |
|
Thank you @kshakir |
Description
is compiled with Java 19Checklist (never delete this)
Never delete this, it is our record that procedure was followed. If you find that for whatever reason one of the checklist points doesn't apply to your PR, you can leave it unchecked but please add an explanation below.
Content
Review
For more detailed guidelines, see https://github.com/broadinstitute/picard/wiki/Guidelines-for-pull-requests