Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add event_info to define unique SV records #9673

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rmadupuri
Copy link
Contributor

@rmadupuri rmadupuri commented Jul 13, 2022

Describe changes proposed in this pull request:

We currently are the using the following genomic columns to define the uniqueness of SV records.

  • Sample_Id
  • Site1_Hugo_Symbol
  • Site1_Entrez_Gene_Id
  • Site1_Chromosome
  • Site1_Position
  • Site1_Region_Number
  • Site1_Ensembl_Transcript_Id
  • Site2_Hugo_Symbol
  • Site2_Entrez_Gene_Id
  • Site2_Chromosome
  • Site2_Position
  • Site2_Region_Number
  • Site2_Ensembl_Transcript_Id

Added Event_Info to the list as some of the impact and archer fusions (detected based on DNA & RNA sequencing and differ by values in event_info) should be allowed. They were dropped otherwise.

@rmadupuri rmadupuri requested a review from averyniceday July 13, 2022 21:57
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@averyniceday averyniceday merged commit 9e1e6d7 into master Jul 14, 2022
@rmadupuri rmadupuri deleted the sv_validation_update branch July 19, 2022 17:57
@rmadupuri rmadupuri restored the sv_validation_update branch July 21, 2022 19:41
@dippindots dippindots deleted the sv_validation_update branch July 20, 2023 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants