Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: add remodeling test using fakestore #14955

Conversation

valentindavid
Copy link
Contributor

This was merged in #14305
But it disappeared, probably during a rebase.

@valentindavid valentindavid added Run nested The PR also runs tests inluded in nested suite FDE Manager Pull requests that target FDE manager branch labels Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@pedronis pedronis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (fde-manager-features@d8bcf84). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             fde-manager-features   #14955   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                        ?   78.16%           
=======================================================
  Files                           ?     1168           
  Lines                           ?   155000           
  Branches                        ?        0           
=======================================================
  Hits                            ?   121151           
  Misses                          ?    26337           
  Partials                        ?     7512           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.16% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@alfonsosanchezbeato alfonsosanchezbeato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comments as for #14851 - anyway, I think that for the future repack-kernel.sh and the steps taken when preparing should be scripts in $TESTLIB, but of course that is a TODO for later, when the branch in finally merged to master.

@valentindavid valentindavid force-pushed the valentindavid/lost-commit branch from 51ac448 to 55e15ed Compare January 22, 2025 12:50
Copy link
Member

@alfonsosanchezbeato alfonsosanchezbeato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks

@pedronis pedronis merged commit ff98281 into canonical:fde-manager-features Jan 22, 2025
54 of 59 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FDE Manager Pull requests that target FDE manager branch Run nested The PR also runs tests inluded in nested suite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants