-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a test that verifies we prefer a non lexical scope over a lexical scope when doing unqualified name lookup #4591
Conversation
…on lexical scope over a lexical scope
Since this came out of #4574, zygoloid might be a better reviewer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks!
toolchain/check/testdata/function/call/prefer_unqualified_lookup.carbon
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
…on lexical scope over a lexical scope
…into unqualified
…on lexical scope over a lexical scope
I hope this passes now. |
…on lexical scope over a lexical scope (carbon-language#4591) This adds missing test coverage. See discussion in carbon-language#4574.
…on lexical scope over a lexical scope (carbon-language#4591) This adds missing test coverage. See discussion in carbon-language#4574.
This adds missing test coverage.
See discussion in #4574.