CIP Editor Application | Ryan Williams (@Ryun1) #473
Merged
+6
−4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
KtorZ
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am more than happy to welcome you onboard and glad that you are open to help us manage the CIP process in a more "official" manner. You have demonstrated over the past months your implication to the CIP process and you have been a fantastic help. The CIP process has grown a lot since it started and we do need help as editors to absorb and organize all incoming (and past!) proposals.
PS: Please add yourself to the editors table on the top-level repository's README as well 🙏
Ryun1
added a commit
to Ryun1/CIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
* Ryan Williams (@Ryun1) CIP editor application * Added name to top level repo readMe
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear all,
I would be grateful for you to consider me as a CIP editor candidate.
For the last six months I have been keenly engaged with the CIP process . Notably across this time I have primarily worked on engaging and acting on feedback for CIPs adjacent to Project Catalyst. See some contributions: #373, #426, #427, #461, throughout #296. Further, I have been keen to spread awareness of the CIP process and its progress, in this light writing and sharing weekly CIP updates (What happened in CIPs last week?) is something I very much enjoy. Most recently I have been attempting to champion a new proposal (#462) aimed at addressing community concerns around an implementation and evolution of an older proposal (CIP-30).
Should you not have further questions on my suitability, I would be happy to engage further by committing myself to editor tasks.