-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TUI: Add recipient address entry #1607
Conversation
ch1bo
commented
Sep 6, 2024
- Adds a new option when selecting the recipient to allow for a "manual entry"
- Validates entered addresses to be valid bech32
- Fixes event handling to a point where copy & paste works
- Before the event handlers for quitting and showing/disabling logs were interfering
- Only display and handle log controls when no modal open
- CHANGELOG updated
- Documentation update not needed
- Haddocks update not needed
- No new TODOs introduced
a104f9c
to
1475bc3
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5196 | 5.61 | 2.21 | 0.44 |
2 | 5394 | 7.09 | 2.80 | 0.47 |
3 | 5597 | 8.73 | 3.46 | 0.49 |
5 | 6000 | 11.45 | 4.53 | 0.54 |
10 | 7010 | 18.02 | 7.12 | 0.66 |
56 | 16253 | 81.66 | 32.30 | 1.76 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 569 | 10.52 | 4.15 | 0.29 |
2 | 755 | 13.86 | 5.65 | 0.34 |
3 | 945 | 17.33 | 7.20 | 0.38 |
5 | 1317 | 24.65 | 10.44 | 0.48 |
10 | 2258 | 45.22 | 19.36 | 0.75 |
20 | 4123 | 95.99 | 40.76 | 1.40 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 560 | 21.46 | 8.41 | 0.41 |
2 | 114 | 671 | 33.97 | 13.43 | 0.55 |
3 | 170 | 782 | 46.22 | 18.48 | 0.69 |
4 | 225 | 893 | 59.10 | 23.88 | 0.84 |
5 | 282 | 1004 | 79.71 | 32.26 | 1.07 |
6 | 340 | 1116 | 96.59 | 39.37 | 1.26 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 640 | 17.93 | 7.87 | 0.38 |
2 | 731 | 17.80 | 8.51 | 0.39 |
3 | 904 | 20.76 | 10.44 | 0.43 |
5 | 1168 | 22.80 | 12.64 | 0.48 |
10 | 1980 | 32.54 | 20.12 | 0.65 |
49 | 7856 | 99.00 | 74.38 | 1.83 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 644 | 21.02 | 9.41 | 0.42 |
2 | 818 | 22.49 | 10.83 | 0.45 |
3 | 919 | 23.84 | 12.17 | 0.47 |
5 | 1186 | 26.90 | 15.02 | 0.53 |
10 | 1988 | 35.50 | 23.06 | 0.69 |
49 | 7895 | 97.18 | 82.25 | 1.88 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 676 | 27.14 | 11.66 | 0.48 |
2 | 885 | 29.38 | 13.56 | 0.52 |
3 | 1025 | 30.98 | 15.00 | 0.55 |
5 | 1334 | 34.95 | 18.36 | 0.62 |
10 | 2001 | 44.04 | 26.15 | 0.78 |
38 | 6450 | 99.17 | 73.04 | 1.76 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5102 | 17.43 | 7.59 | 0.57 |
2 | 5252 | 29.24 | 12.89 | 0.71 |
3 | 5356 | 42.50 | 18.80 | 0.86 |
4 | 5427 | 56.35 | 24.94 | 1.02 |
5 | 5556 | 71.14 | 31.47 | 1.20 |
6 | 5780 | 97.50 | 43.45 | 1.51 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5033 | 7.95 | 3.36 | 0.46 |
5 | 1 | 57 | 5068 | 9.08 | 4.08 | 0.48 |
5 | 5 | 284 | 5203 | 13.21 | 6.75 | 0.53 |
5 | 10 | 571 | 5374 | 18.87 | 10.31 | 0.61 |
5 | 20 | 1141 | 5714 | 30.67 | 17.63 | 0.78 |
5 | 30 | 1709 | 6054 | 42.10 | 24.80 | 0.94 |
5 | 40 | 2277 | 6392 | 53.23 | 31.84 | 1.09 |
5 | 50 | 2840 | 6725 | 64.17 | 38.80 | 1.24 |
5 | 81 | 4612 | 7784 | 99.73 | 61.10 | 1.74 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-09-08 10:56:21.418147904 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 3000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.617196864 |
P99 | 9.342125739999922ms |
P95 | 5.9449925ms |
P50 | 4.396366ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 9000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 24.017894112 |
P99 | 105.27040219000004ms |
P95 | 33.26383734999999ms |
P50 | 21.595625ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
d17fe8f
to
45e27e3
Compare