-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Markdown table and headings for the memory report #1850
Conversation
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | - | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | +0.39 | +0.09 | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | |||
37 | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
34 | - | - | - | - |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(5, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(10, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(20, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(37, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6093 | 10.80 | 3.35 | 0.53 |
2 | 6296 | 13.35 | 4.15 | 0.57 |
3 | 6496 | 15.50 | 4.80 | 0.60 |
5 | 6897 | 19.94 | 6.16 | 0.66 |
10 | 7907 | 31.06 | 9.57 | 0.82 |
40 | 13933 | 98.61 | 30.29 | 1.78 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 740 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 917 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1282 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2170 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10049 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 26.44 | 7.58 | 0.44 |
2 | 114 | 636 | 34.88 | 9.98 | 0.53 |
3 | 170 | 747 | 44.80 | 12.75 | 0.64 |
4 | 228 | 858 | 52.15 | 14.92 | 0.72 |
5 | 282 | 969 | 60.76 | 17.38 | 0.81 |
6 | 341 | 1081 | 72.90 | 20.63 | 0.94 |
7 | 394 | 1192 | 88.26 | 24.70 | 1.09 |
8 | 448 | 1303 | 85.25 | 24.52 | 1.07 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1797 | 25.50 | 8.33 | 0.50 |
2 | 1928 | 26.69 | 9.39 | 0.52 |
3 | 2018 | 27.59 | 10.25 | 0.54 |
5 | 2377 | 32.56 | 13.28 | 0.61 |
10 | 3149 | 42.54 | 19.85 | 0.78 |
39 | 7362 | 98.53 | 56.99 | 1.68 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 597 | 23.99 | 7.61 | 0.43 |
2 | 741 | 25.59 | 8.72 | 0.45 |
3 | 1007 | 29.47 | 10.46 | 0.51 |
5 | 1300 | 32.91 | 12.74 | 0.57 |
10 | 1914 | 39.84 | 17.96 | 0.69 |
39 | 6259 | 98.77 | 53.53 | 1.61 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 651 | 30.95 | 9.68 | 0.50 |
2 | 846 | 33.55 | 11.23 | 0.54 |
3 | 906 | 32.07 | 11.34 | 0.53 |
5 | 1309 | 37.31 | 14.52 | 0.61 |
10 | 2086 | 50.51 | 22.05 | 0.81 |
35 | 5876 | 99.67 | 54.68 | 1.61 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 628 | 35.29 | 10.70 | 0.54 |
2 | 835 | 38.15 | 12.33 | 0.58 |
3 | 1077 | 41.73 | 14.28 | 0.64 |
5 | 1233 | 44.59 | 16.26 | 0.68 |
10 | 2146 | 58.55 | 24.22 | 0.89 |
27 | 4549 | 98.02 | 47.75 | 1.49 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5984 | 28.16 | 9.29 | 0.71 |
2 | 6159 | 38.40 | 12.71 | 0.82 |
3 | 6225 | 44.51 | 14.66 | 0.89 |
4 | 6404 | 56.68 | 18.79 | 1.03 |
5 | 6488 | 66.66 | 22.01 | 1.13 |
6 | 6694 | 78.22 | 25.87 | 1.26 |
7 | 6793 | 80.28 | 26.49 | 1.29 |
8 | 6954 | 98.36 | 32.51 | 1.49 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 5 | 285 | 6261 | 30.77 | 10.75 | 0.75 |
10 | 10 | 571 | 6432 | 40.96 | 14.72 | 0.87 |
10 | 20 | 1137 | 6769 | 62.26 | 22.99 | 1.12 |
10 | 37 | 2107 | 7350 | 99.40 | 37.34 | 1.55 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-02-12 10:13:04.658520917 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.573133156 |
P99 | 9.470246379999995ms |
P95 | 5.7302551ms |
P50 | 4.391218ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-02-12 10:11:40.340185015 UTC | 942M | 3733M |
2025-02-12 10:11:45.340263571 UTC | 1021M | 3632M |
2025-02-12 10:11:50.340205506 UTC | 1026M | 3627M |
2025-02-12 10:11:55.340215203 UTC | 1027M | 3626M |
2025-02-12 10:12:00.340212225 UTC | 1031M | 3622M |
2025-02-12 10:12:05.340158953 UTC | 1030M | 3622M |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 23.295633306 |
P99 | 73.18168878ms |
P95 | 32.052332549999996ms |
P50 | 21.069676ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-02-12 10:12:17.58373908 UTC | 946M | 3717M |
2025-02-12 10:12:22.583728214 UTC | 1135M | 3528M |
2025-02-12 10:12:27.583736937 UTC | 1135M | 3527M |
2025-02-12 10:12:32.583687127 UTC | 1143M | 3519M |
2025-02-12 10:12:37.584022252 UTC | 1194M | 3399M |
2025-02-12 10:12:42.583736457 UTC | 1224M | 3288M |
2025-02-12 10:12:47.583719294 UTC | 1224M | 3286M |
2025-02-12 10:12:52.583720973 UTC | 1228M | 3282M |
2025-02-12 10:12:57.583689528 UTC | 1231M | 3279M |
2025-02-12 10:13:02.583746325 UTC | 1239M | 3271M |
c51063c
to
7e5eaa1
Compare
Fixes #1837