-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi party, networked offline heads #1851
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This simulates the corresponding initTx and commitTx transactions
In favor of the --initial-utxo et al options
Seemingly is the ouroboros-network stack quite lazy on reconnecting.
This reverts commit ba6f570.
87ade0b
to
e21c830
Compare
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | - | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | +0.39 | +0.09 | +0.01 |
37 | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
34 | - | - | - | - |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(5, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(10, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(20, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(37, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6094 | 11.11 | 3.46 | 0.53 |
2 | 6294 | 13.44 | 4.18 | 0.57 |
3 | 6496 | 15.28 | 4.73 | 0.59 |
5 | 6897 | 20.19 | 6.25 | 0.66 |
10 | 7903 | 31.18 | 9.61 | 0.82 |
40 | 13937 | 98.27 | 30.17 | 1.77 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 558 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 740 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 919 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1280 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2176 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10062 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 25.64 | 7.39 | 0.43 |
2 | 113 | 636 | 35.86 | 10.21 | 0.54 |
3 | 171 | 747 | 45.82 | 12.99 | 0.65 |
4 | 227 | 858 | 56.50 | 15.94 | 0.76 |
5 | 280 | 969 | 62.04 | 17.65 | 0.82 |
6 | 337 | 1085 | 78.97 | 22.13 | 1.00 |
7 | 395 | 1192 | 80.25 | 22.79 | 1.02 |
8 | 448 | 1303 | 91.27 | 25.81 | 1.13 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1793 | 25.50 | 8.33 | 0.50 |
2 | 1946 | 26.99 | 9.47 | 0.52 |
3 | 2107 | 29.48 | 10.98 | 0.56 |
5 | 2415 | 32.89 | 13.43 | 0.62 |
10 | 3190 | 44.54 | 20.52 | 0.80 |
38 | 7444 | 99.58 | 57.07 | 1.69 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 23.99 | 7.61 | 0.43 |
2 | 740 | 25.55 | 8.71 | 0.45 |
3 | 950 | 28.50 | 10.18 | 0.50 |
5 | 1302 | 34.24 | 13.09 | 0.58 |
10 | 2099 | 43.16 | 18.88 | 0.73 |
38 | 6156 | 96.44 | 52.24 | 1.58 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 712 | 29.19 | 9.23 | 0.48 |
2 | 812 | 30.98 | 10.43 | 0.51 |
3 | 970 | 32.86 | 11.67 | 0.54 |
5 | 1252 | 37.14 | 14.40 | 0.61 |
10 | 2056 | 51.08 | 22.19 | 0.81 |
35 | 5931 | 99.52 | 54.88 | 1.61 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 675 | 35.99 | 11.01 | 0.55 |
2 | 891 | 38.85 | 12.65 | 0.59 |
3 | 1035 | 41.02 | 13.97 | 0.63 |
5 | 1392 | 46.78 | 17.22 | 0.71 |
10 | 2105 | 58.83 | 24.34 | 0.89 |
27 | 4610 | 97.97 | 47.87 | 1.49 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5968 | 28.20 | 9.30 | 0.71 |
2 | 6174 | 38.31 | 12.70 | 0.82 |
3 | 6172 | 43.26 | 14.21 | 0.87 |
4 | 6551 | 59.67 | 19.78 | 1.06 |
5 | 6585 | 67.84 | 22.42 | 1.15 |
6 | 6521 | 71.36 | 23.47 | 1.18 |
7 | 6679 | 81.83 | 26.92 | 1.30 |
8 | 6870 | 92.11 | 30.36 | 1.42 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 0 | 0 | 6091 | 19.20 | 6.31 | 0.62 |
10 | 1 | 57 | 6125 | 21.79 | 7.29 | 0.65 |
10 | 5 | 284 | 6261 | 29.85 | 10.44 | 0.74 |
10 | 10 | 568 | 6429 | 40.04 | 14.41 | 0.86 |
10 | 20 | 1139 | 6771 | 61.80 | 22.83 | 1.11 |
10 | 30 | 1710 | 7113 | 84.49 | 31.56 | 1.37 |
10 | 37 | 2105 | 7347 | 98.94 | 37.19 | 1.54 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-02-12 11:08:07.654241493 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.921407156 |
P99 | 10.303321779999985ms |
P95 | 6.278176950000001ms |
P50 | 4.695902ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-02-12 11:06:42.705335918 UTC | 954M | 6123M |
2025-02-12 11:06:47.705415431 UTC | 1051M | 5943M |
2025-02-12 11:06:52.705263549 UTC | 1054M | 5939M |
2025-02-12 11:06:57.705407252 UTC | 1054M | 5939M |
2025-02-12 11:07:02.705295211 UTC | 1056M | 5938M |
2025-02-12 11:07:07.705270071 UTC | 1056M | 5937M |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 22.696860450 |
P99 | 42.7382105799994ms |
P95 | 30.588754899999998ms |
P50 | 20.605814ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Memory data
Time | Used | Free |
---|---|---|
2025-02-12 11:07:20.683230125 UTC | 973M | 6031M |
2025-02-12 11:07:25.683378301 UTC | 1145M | 5859M |
2025-02-12 11:07:30.683428839 UTC | 1146M | 5857M |
2025-02-12 11:07:35.683357484 UTC | 1150M | 5853M |
2025-02-12 11:07:40.683607107 UTC | 1199M | 5730M |
2025-02-12 11:07:45.683408028 UTC | 1229M | 5627M |
2025-02-12 11:07:50.683372941 UTC | 1229M | 5627M |
2025-02-12 11:07:55.683396501 UTC | 1237M | 5618M |
2025-02-12 11:08:00.683350137 UTC | 1236M | 5618M |
2025-02-12 11:08:05.683270168 UTC | 1242M | 5612M |
This is a change I encountered when rebasing
raft-network
for #1720 and was useful back in the spike, but would have also been valuable in thehydra-doom
use case.Anyways, this is adding a
--offline-head-seed
argument to offline mode and fixes the "simulation" opened head to be deterministic across multiple instances, resulting that the nodes can and do talk to each other and consequently sign snapshots.