Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bindings for MS MARCO V2.1 prebuilt indexes + qrels #2459

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lintool
Copy link
Member

@lintool lintool commented Apr 20, 2024

Allows us to directly perform MS MARCO V2.1 runs.

@lintool lintool requested review from sahel-sh and ronakice April 20, 2024 13:19
Copy link
Member

@ronakice ronakice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.80%. Comparing base (4f96751) to head (f90da25).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2459      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     66.78%   66.80%   +0.01%     
  Complexity     1418     1418              
============================================
  Files           213      213              
  Lines         12199    12206       +7     
  Branches       1488     1488              
============================================
+ Hits           8147     8154       +7     
  Misses         3538     3538              
  Partials        514      514              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lintool lintool merged commit 9863611 into master Apr 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@lintool lintool deleted the msmarco-doc21 branch April 20, 2024 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants