Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

docs: improve error handling documentation and messages #4264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

docs: improve error handling documentation and messages #4264

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

DeVikingMark
Copy link
Contributor

This commit improves the error handling in the app/errors package by:

  • Adding documentation for AppErrorsCodespace constant
  • Clarifying the error code range convention
  • Improving error message clarity for ErrTxExceedsMaxSize
  • Adding proper documentation for error variables

These changes make the error handling more maintainable and
easier to understand for other developers.

@DeVikingMark DeVikingMark requested a review from a team as a code owner January 25, 2025 02:38
@DeVikingMark DeVikingMark requested review from rootulp and ninabarbakadze and removed request for a team January 25, 2025 02:38
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in the app/errors/errors.go file introduce a new constant AppErrorsCodespace to define a unique identifier for the application error space. The modification aims to improve error handling by providing a clear demarcation for app-specific errors. The comment for ErrTxExceedsMaxSize has been refined to explicitly state its purpose when a transaction size surpasses the maximum allowed limit. Additionally, the documentation clarifies that application error codes start from 11000 to prevent potential conflicts with other modules.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/errors/errors.go - Added constant AppErrorsCodespace = "app"
- Updated comment for ErrTxExceedsMaxSize to clarify transaction size limit error
- Updated comment about application error code range starting from 11000

Suggested labels

external

Suggested reviewers

  • liamsi
  • evan-forbes
  • rootulp
  • cmwaters
  • ninabarbakadze
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jan 25, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/errors/errors.go (1)

11-11: Consider documenting the upper bound of error codes.

While the comment clearly states that error codes start from 11000, it would be helpful to also document the upper bound of the range to prevent future conflicts.

-// Application error codes start from 11000 to avoid conflicts with other modules
+// Application error codes use the range 11000-11999 to avoid conflicts with other modules
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 629b807 and d121506.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/errors/errors.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/errors/errors.go (2)

7-8: Well-documented constant definition!

The documentation clearly explains the purpose of AppErrorsCodespace and its role in error separation.

13-14: Clear and consistent error definition!

The error message and documentation are well-aligned, providing clear information about when this error occurs.

rach-id
rach-id approved these changes Jan 27, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DeVikingMark for future contributions, please refer to our good-first-issue issues:

@rach-id rach-id merged commit ef635a2 into celestiaorg:main Jan 27, 2025
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@rach-id rach-id rach-id approved these changes

@rootulp rootulp rootulp approved these changes

@ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze Awaiting requested review from ninabarbakadze ninabarbakadze is a code owner automatically assigned from celestiaorg/celestia-core

@cmwaters cmwaters Awaiting requested review from cmwaters

@evan-forbes evan-forbes Awaiting requested review from evan-forbes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
external
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@DeVikingMark @rootulp @rach-id